About Me

My testimony starts with my father and mother’s testimony as they both were so integral in me coming to Christ as a child.

My father was baptized as an infant and raised in the Catholic church.  My mother was raised in a Baptist church.  My father’s parents were not genuine believers, but they raised their family in the Catholic church because of the societal pressure from their relatives. 

My mother’s parents were not true believers either, but they raised my mother in the Baptist church because of pressure from my mother’s grandmother who was a devout born-again Christian.  When my mother’s grandmother died when she was child, her parents stopped taking her to the Baptist church.

While my mother and father were initially married by a judge, my father asked my mother to convert to Catholicism so they could be married in the Catholic church and have their future children baptized in the Catholic church – and my mother did just that and my older sisters, I and my younger brother were all baptized in the Catholic church.

Eventually my mom decided she did not like the Catholic church, and she asked my father if they could start attending a Baptist church – and he was completely opposed to attending a Baptist church.  He agreed as a compromise to change to going to a Lutheran church.

Like many Catholics, Protestants and Orthodox Christians, my parents were not true believers.  They just went to church because it was the socially accepted thing to do, their parents and grandparents before them did it – so they had to do it. 

After my father and mother started attending the Lutheran church, which had a stronger emphasis on Bible teaching, my mother started reading the Bible for herself.  And she came across many Gospel passages and realized she had never truly repented and accepted Christ as her Lord and Savior.  She then called upon the Christ to save her, and her conversion radically changed her life.

When my mother’s grandfather died, my father and mother attended his funeral which was hosted by a local Baptist pastor.  After the funeral service, that Baptist preacher shared the Gospel with my father and while my dad did not accept it there the Lord was working on his heart. 

At the same time, my mother as a new believer met a woman from that same church where that pastor was from.  And that woman mentored my mother in how to be a godly submissive wife.   She taught my mother to practice 1 Peter 3:1-2 with my father to help win him to Christ.

After my father accepted Christ, he stood up in that Baptist church and he told the people there that it was because of my mother’s newfound faith, and the total transformation he saw in her from a rebellious woman to a submissive wife, that he came to Christ.

So, if I were to trace my true spiritual heritage, I owe the fact that I was raised by a born-again, bible believing father and mother to my great-grandmother and my own mother who were huge godly influences in the lives of my great-grandfather and my father.

My Conversion and the Confirmation of My Faith

My father moved around for work, but my parents continued to faithfully serve in the Baptist churches they attended. When I was 7 years old, my parents sent me to church camp with the Baptist church we were attending at that time.   It was there at that camp as I heard the Gospel and read the Bible that I realized I was not saved.

I came home from church camp and explained to my father what I had learned at camp and that I knew I was not saved. My father took me through some more Scripture passages and then I repented of my sins and called upon Christ as my Lord and Savior as a 7-year-old boy.

I continued with my family and parents in the Baptist church for most of my life and then after I graduated from a Baptist Christian high school and started community college, I wanted to explore other religions as well as the different Christian denominations.

I read books on Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism.  I read books on the history of the development of the Christian church including the early church, Roman Catholicism, the Great Schism and the Protestant Reformation and books on Baptist history.

After a couple years of these studies, I was more convinced than ever of my belief that Christianity was the one true faith, my belief in the Protestant doctrines of sola scriptura, sola fide, sola gratia and my beliefs in the Baptist distinctives of believer’s baptism and the autonomy of the local church.

My Rejection of Dispensationalism and Calvinism

There were, however, some things I came to question that were taught to me in the Baptist churches I grew up in. One of the first areas I began to question as a young man in my 20s was my church’s teachings on eschatology.

My issue was not with premillennialism itself, as I found that to be solidly based on a literal interpretation of prophesies of the Bible concerning the end times.  My issue was with Dispensational Premillennialism which I found to be wanting for Scriptural support for their “secret rapture” theory and some other things they taught.

I discovered the writings of Charles Spurgeon, his critiques of Dispensationalism, and his belief in Historic Premillennialism which aligned with that of the early church fathers.  And I found myself in general agreement with Spurgeon on this.

As I explored Spurgeon’s writings more, I came across his beliefs in the doctrines of Calvinism. And I thought that if he was right about Historic Premillennialism as I had come to believe, then perhaps he was right about Calvinism to. 

Even as I began to identify as a Calvinist, I always had some doubts about Calvinism, but I figured if Spurgeon, the Reformers and Augustine all thought these doctrines were right, then they must be.

A couple years later, as I was studying the Scriptures I came across 1 Peter 1:2’s phrase “Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father” and God revealed to me that I was not chosen to believe on Christ – but rather that I was chosen to be justified, sanctified and glorified because God foresaw before I was ever born that one day I would believe.  It was at that point that I utterly rejected the doctrines of Calvinism.

My doubts about my pastor’s teachings on Dispensationalism and then my doubts about Spurgeon, the Reformers and Augustine’s teachings on Calvinism taught me a valuable life lesson as a Christian man.  

Except for Christ and his Apostles and the prophets before them – no one is inerrant in their interpretation or applications of the Bible.  We can and must accept that these great men may have been right on some things and wrong in others.

My conversion from Complementarianism to Biblical Patriarchy

When I entered my second marriage, both my wife and I were complementarians.  We believed in the modern extremely water-down version of male headship in marriage.  This modern view of marriage makes the husband no more than a figure head leader who offers suggestions to his wife. Complementarians see marriage as a generally equal partnership with the tie-breaking vote belonging to a husband if the couple cannot agree on decisions.

I wasn’t just a Complementarian; I was a full on “Mr. Nice Guy” Complementarian believing that if I was just a “servant leader” and sought to make my wife happy that we would have a good marriage.   

I bought my second wife lavish jewelry and took her on expensive trips all hoping to make her happy and truly win her love and affection.  I cooked and cleaned as I worked on my software development job from home, and she worked at the hospital as a nurse.   And while there were brief moments when she appeared happy, those moments became shorter and shorter.

Some might say the reason for the failure in our marriage was not because the Complementarian or “Mr. Nice Guy” approaches don’t work – they would just say maybe she had some issues with finding her own happiness that had nothing to do with me.

And I will fully admit, I have met couples over the years that have Complementarian or even Egalitarian marriages that seem to have very happy and even long-lasting marriages. 

My second marriage could have been to a woman who didn’t bring in all the emotional baggage, discontentment, entitlement and stubbornness that my second wife brought with her.  My second marriage could have been to a woman who found her value in being a wife to me rather than in her career and one who was grateful and appreciative for anything I did for her. 

And if that were the case, we may have had a happy Complementarian marriage – and I would have never realized the truth that Complementarianism is an unbiblical way to conduct marriage.

In 2012, about two years into my second marriage, I began a deep study of all the Bible passages relating to marriage. As I studied the Scriptures, I saw in the Hebrew Language of the Old Testament that the husband was referred to as his wife’s master and owner. 

And I saw in the New Testament in Ephesians 5:22 that wives were commanded to submit to their husbands not just as figured head leaders, but “as unto the Lord” and that in 1 Peter 3:5-6 wives were commanded to be subjection to their husbands, to be obedient them and to refer to them as their “lord”.

I came to realize that the Bible does not present marriage as an equal partnership with the husband only being a figure head and tie breaker.  But rather, the Bible presents marriage as a benevolent master/servant relationship with the man representing God as the loving master and the woman representing the people of God as the adoring servant to the master.

And I discovered that I was not alone in my new understanding of marriage as a benevolent master/adoring servant relationship but that this belief was the traditional interpretation of the Bible by church leaders across the centuries and in modern times it was referred to as “Biblical Patriarchy”.

My Discovery About the Purpose of Life and Marriage

The “Purpose Driven Life” was published by Rick Warren in 2002 and it became a worldwide phenomenon selling more than 11 million copies in the first year.  In the book, Pastor Warren said what a lot of Christian Pastors had said for years that the meaning and purpose of life was to worship God, fellowship with other Christians, become more like Christ, serve in ministries and give the Gospel to others. 

While it is true that we as Christians are commanded to do all those things that Rick Warren mentions in his book “The Purpose Driven Life” – it is not true that the Bible say these things are the primary purpose for which we were created.

Once I discovered the historic Christian teaching that marriage is indeed a master/servant relationship I sought to understand WHY God setup marriage in this way.  And this is when I came across a passage in 1 Corinthians 11 which shows the true purpose for which men and women were created by God.

“the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man… forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man… Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man. For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head”

1 Corinthians 11:3,7 & 9-10

I came to realize that God created male human beings to image his masculine nature, to literally live out his attributes.  Men image God in their life’s work in various industries as builders, creators, warriors, athletes and scholars.  They also image God as husbands and fathers.

1 Corinthians 11:9 absolutely crushes the modern notion that men and women were made for each other – it tells us that God made the woman for the man, and he did not make the man for the woman.

God tells us to honor the woman “as the weaker vessel” in 1 Peter 3:7. Why are we called to honor weakness? Because this was part of God’s grand design.  God purposefully created women weaker both emotionally and physically so that they would need men to lead, provide for and protect them and this gave men a way to fulfill their intended design.

What does 1 Corinthians 11:7-9 show us is the meaning of life? Answer – to fulfill the reason for which we were created.  If we are born in the male human body, then our purpose is to image God in all his various masculine attributes including as a worker, a husband and a father and thereby bring him glory.  And if we are born in a female human body our purpose is to find a male human to serve as his wife, the mother of his children and the keeper of his home and thereby bring our husband glory and as a result bring glory to God.

The Birth of BiblicalGenderRoles.com

In 2014, after two years of study and the realization of the truth of the doctrines of Biblical Patriarchy, God placed a great burden on my heart to stand in this gap, to teach these lost or ignored doctrines that were not being taught in our modern churches.

Men were not being taught how to be men and women were not being taught how to be women – at least not from the Bible.  Most churches were encouraging young women to have careers and to postpone getting married and having children. And when they did have children to have a small number of children.  And most churches were teaching men it was impossible to be sole providers, that they would need to seek out career women who would share the load of leading and providing for the family as their partners in marriage. 

And this is why in April of 2014, I started my blog – BiblicalGenderRoles.com.

I am fully convinced of the truth of Romans 8:28 which says “And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose”.  Everything that happened in my life prior to 2014 when I started Biblicalgenderroles.com, was ordained by God to bring me to start this ministry.

About five years after I started BiblicalGenderRoles.com, at the request of several of my readers, I started my podcast ministry BGRLearning.com in 2019.  Since then, I have created several series and hundreds of podcasts, some directly based on popular articles I have written on BiblicalGenderRoles.com and others being brand new original content.  And I am thankful to God that this podcast ministry is still going strong and I get people who write me regularly now to tell me how these podcasts have changed their lives.

I am also grateful that in the last few years God has allowed me to start Instagram and X (formerly Twitter) ministries that have seen good growth in spreading the message of God’s Word concerning gender roles.

When I started this ministry back in 2014, I was one of only a small handful of voices calling people back to the doctrines of Biblical Patriarchy as found in the Bible.  I am happy to say that since that time God has moved hearts and minds in America and now many new voices have joined this fight for the restoration of Biblical Patriarchy especially on Instagram and X.

As I write this testimony in January of 2025, BiblicalGenderRoles.com has reached over 7 million people and had nearly 14 million views of various pages and content.  And while I do receive a great deal of hateful emails and comments what truly encourages me is the positive emails I receive from men and women of all ages telling me how much the content of this blog has helped them grow in their walk with God and find a true biblical based purpose for their lives.

Answers to Other Questions People Commonly Ask Me

I believe in verbal plenary inspiration of the Bible – that the 66 books of the Bible, the 39 of the Old Testament and the 27 of the New Testament are the inerrant Word of God.  Not only do I believe in the infallibility of the Bible, but I also am a Biblical Literalist.  That means I believe with the rare exception of some symbolisms in biblical prophecy, that the Bible should be taken literally.

Because I am a Biblical Literalist, I am also a young earth creationist meaning that I believe God created the earth in six literal days – it did not evolve over six “periods” of time as some Christians teach.

I believe Jesus Christ was the sinless Son of God, part of the triune God head of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.  That Christ was sent by the father, born of a virgin and he gave his life on the cross for the sins of mankind and rose again the third day.

I believe the Gospel as stated in Romans 10:9 “That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved”. 

I believe we as believers were predestined to be “called”, “justified” and “glorified” as Romans 8:30 states according to “the foreknowledge of God the Father” (1 Peter 1:2) that we would believe.  In other words, God looked into the future saw who would respond to his call to believe and predestined those he foreknew would believe to be justified, sanctified and glorified – Amen.

With that said, I utterly reject the doctrines of Calvinism which say that we must first be regenerated in order to believe.   The Scriptures are clear in Ephesians 1:13 of the order of the salvation process – first we hear the word of truth, then we believe, then we are indwelled with the Holy Spirit who regenerates us. 

I am a husband, father and grandfather in my early 50s. My five children are all adults and some are married with children.

When I start this blog in 2014, Proverbs 22:3 came to mind which states A prudent man foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished. I knew some people would seek to punish me for the Biblically based views I would espouse on this site – so I decided to write under the pen name “Larry Solomon“.

My first name really is “Larry” but my real last name is not “Solomon”.

I knew some people would seek to hurt me by trying to get me fired from my job or other even causing me physical harm. And I was right, there have been several doxing attempts and even death threats against me since I started this ministry.

My ethnicity is white, specifically I am of British, German and other Eastern European decent.  My great great grandmother was a German Jew who married another non-Jewish German immigrant after they moved to Canada in the late 19th century after which their children and my ancestors moved to America in Michigan where my family resides today. 

The Bible says in Romans 11:25-28 that the majority of the physical descendants of Jacob, whom God renamed “Israel” and were later called “Jews”, are blinded to truth of the Gospel and their true Messiah, Jesus Christ.  The Apostle Paul says they are “enemies” of Christians, yet “they are beloved for the father’s sakes”.  And it for this reason that I am honored to share even a small part in the physical blood line of Abraham, Issac and Jacob who were the ancestors of the mother of my Lord and Savior – Jesus Christ.

While I don’t really talk about prophecy or politics much here on BiblicalGenderRoles.com, occasionally over the years I have written about my views of politics on the BiblicistReport.com (A site I built specifically for political issues from a Biblical perspective).

I am a Historic Premillennialist as opposed to a Dispensational Premillennialist as it relates to my interpretation of Biblical prophecies.   And I do not believe Historic Premillennialism is inconsistent with Christian Nationalism which I also believe in.  Many of my Biblical Patriarchist friends are Postmillennialists believing that all nations will be brought under Christian rule before Christ returns.  I don’t believe that view is supported by a literal reading of the Scriptures.  However, that does not mean that there won’t or couldn’t be some nations under the rule of Christian law when Christ returns – and I hope we can make America into one of those nations.     

I have not addressed it yet on that site, but I probably will address the Jewish issue as it has been at hot topic of conversation amongst Biblical Patriarchs in recent years.  For now, I will just say that I believe we can and should see Jews in America as political and spiritual enemies in that they oppose Christianity and specifically Christian nationalism.  Jewish funded politic pacts have for decades driven the secularization of America and chasing Christ out of our politics and culture and we as Christians must oppose these secularist efforts wherever they rise. 

Does the fact that I realize Jews are enemies of Christians as clearly stated by the Apostle Paul in Romans 11:28 mean that I support Nazism or depriving American Jews of basic rights to life and property? No.  And those who support such harsh measures against Jews forget the last part of Romans 11:28 – that the blinded and unbelieving Jews while being our enemies are still beloved of God.

No, I do not have a college degree, nor did I attend seminary.   My knowledge is based on my own personal study of the Bible and many church history books and Bible commentaries.

I am a licensed minister, I got my license several years ago to perform marriages for family members who asked me to officiate their marriages.

I am also the worship leader at a Baptist church where I faithfully attend with my family each Sunday.  I have taught Sunday school at Baptist churches that I have attended over the years including the church I have attended for the more than 15 years. 

Does the senior pastor of the church where I am a worship leader know about my ministry? Yes. He and I have been close friends for over 20 years.  Does he agree with everything I write? No.  My pastor is a Complementarian, and I am a Biblical Patriarchist – but he very much believes in my freedom and that of other Christians to believe in and teach the doctrines, principles and practical applications of Biblical Patriarchy.

Does my wife support my ministry? Yes and No.  Like the pastor of our church, she believes that I and other Christians who are Biblical Patriarchists should be able to believe in and teach the principles of Biblical Patriarchy that we believe in.  But no, she does not agree with much of what I write because she is a Complementarian and moderate feminist.

Do my beliefs lead to a lot of conflict in my marriage? Yes. When I changed from a Complementarian to a Biblical Patriarchist back in 2012 it caused a lot of turmoil in my marriage.  If my wife who was a nurse at the time had not had a car accident that disabled her and made me her full-time caretaker, I believe we would have been divorced within a couple years of my change.

But our God is sovereign, and he didn’t want either me or my wife to have it easy.  He decided to give us both a challenging marriage. 

Lastly on my marriage I will say this – my wife is not some helpless victim.  She loves me and I love her – she could have gone her own way even after the accident and started a new life as she is not a paraplegic. But the accident caused us to reevaluate our marriage, and we decided that God wanted us to stay together knowing it would be challenging. 

One of the most challenging parts of our marriage after my conversion from Complementarianism to Biblical Patriarchy has been that we must forgive one another often when the other does not agree that a certain action was sinful.  My wife may act in disrespectful or unsubmissive ways toward me that I believe are sinful but based on her worldview she won’t see those actions as sin – so I must forgive her without getting an apology. 

And it goes the same for her, there are times when I will assert my position as her earthly lord (1 Pet 3:5-6) and head (Eph 5:23-24) and exercise dominance over her or I will discipline her in some non-physical way, and she will see it as me disrespecting her.  And again, I won’t apology in those situations because I don’t believe I did anything wrong – in fact I believe I did what God calls me to do in ruling over her (Gen 3:16).

So that covers it for the most common questions I get asked.  I hope you will explore the rest of my site to learn more about what the Bible says about God’s design of gender roles and marriage as well as sex and discipline in marriage.

44 responses to “About Me”

  1. I’m just curious to know how much you have studied other perspectives on these issues. I am also a mid-thirties individual who has been married ten years and I also do my best to follow God’s design for my life, but I have very different beliefs about God’s design, gender roles, etc. Here are links I’ve shared on my blog pertaining to these issues, from an egalitarian perspective: http://thebeautifulkingdomwarriors.wordpress.com/links/. Here is one article in particular that I think is pertinent: http://equalityinchrist.wordpress.com/2014/04/02/why-complementarians-see-male-leadership-as-gods-design-the-psychology-of-perception-and-seeing-what-we-already-believe/.

  2. Ruth,

    I have in fact studied the egalitarian perspective over many years and respectfully – I find it lacking Scriptural support. I have actually had some great discussions with some reasonably minded egalitarians in online forums, as well as in person. I have had some not so reasonable discussions with some other egalitarians who find it disgusting that people still believe in the traditional view of gender roles as presented in the Bible.

    I believe once we remove our 21st century western cultural lenses, and look at the way God designed things from the beginning, only then do we fully come to grasp the God’s design.

    But when we stray from God’s design, as most of Western civilization has,this is why we see massively high divorce rates and rapidly falling fertility rates.

  3. Hi,
    discovered your site just a few days ago. What a coincidence,
    * similar data: divorced with kids from the first marriage (whom I paid for more than 20 yrs and I’m proud of and lucky about), re-married again, again kids; just a bit older than you
    * conservative christian, white, not seeking for perfectness, but in need of and open for goods love and loving god’s orders (Psalm 119)
    * writing a wordpress-blog with a very similar adress and topic: “http://biblicalfamilylife.wordpress.com/” (hard for you to read, because it’s in german, sorry)
    * in my alias “Altervater” (which means ‘old father’) I’m anticipating and approving/affirming your point ‘elder man, younger woman’
    * also under the protection of anonymity, which I even explain in american english, quoting a blog about economics: “anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. it thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation– and their ideas from suppression– at the hand of an intolerant society.” und: “keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker”. See here: http://www.zerohedge.com/about

    Gratulations to your very clear messages and the professional look and make-of of your site!
    You got one reader more and I will allow myself to translate and reblog articles of you (of course with full source citation and links)
    best regards from Loadstar
    PS: In Mark Twains tradition, there are many nice tries to explain german language to americans, a current one here: http://www.fluentu.com/german/blog/weird-german-words-vocabulary/

    PS II: The mailadress below is wrong because wordpress wanted me to login as I wrote my correct mailadress first (which is connected with my own wordpress-account) and then the site didn’t move on

  4. PS II: Just replace “.fr” by “.de”

  5. Altervater – welcome kindred spirit! Feel free to reference anything here and if you need anything or have questions let me know.

  6. Your blog has piqued my curiosity, glancing it over briefly.

    Likewise I found that the need to fight misandry was/is unavoidable. I’m not a married man, but of course more and more men are seeing the need to be protective. It is decidedly part of my walk with God–a war I sure wish didn’t exist. 😉

    I have more of a passion for the body of Christ than marriage, though. To me–and most certainly according to the Bible–as believers we require the former while the latter is an option (Paul even said that those who are married should live as they were not, 1 Corinthians 7:29). I’ll be taking more looks at your blog later, no doubt.

  7. Thank your for your comments.

    Respectfully I disagree that we do not need marriage as much as the church, in this world, while I agree in the next world marriage will no longer be necessary. Marriage is meant to be a shining symbol of the relationship of God and his people, of Christ and his Church. If only unbelievers were to enter into marriage, that symbolism would be lost as most unbelievers will never attempt to truly live out marriage as God intended it to be.

    While I agree that Paul and Christ honored celibacy, they both presented it as gift from God that few people were given(and for Christians it was to be used in the service of God, not for selfishness). The rest were given the gift of marriage, which Hebrews tells us is to be honored as well.
    Just something to consider.

  8. God is indeed honored in the way people handle their marriages in this life.

    Let’s put it this way: if you were to compile everything the Bible says about marriage, I expect it MIGHT fill about two pages. Maybe three. Consider how much more than that is written regarding our interactions as a church, how much more is written in the vein of “love your neighbor as yourself.”

    The health of marriage is very important. It is one “positions” in which many (if not most) are called to glorify God today.

    If only unbelievers were to enter into marriage, that symbolism would be lost as most unbelievers will never attempt to truly live out marriage as God intended it to be.

    And yet, interestingly, in non-westernized cultures where Christianity is less present, marriages tend to fare better–the LEAST you can say for marriages on the Eastern hemisphere (i.e. less touched by westernization, feminism, and even Christianity) is that the divorce rates are a lot lower. That is indisputable. Now that is of course to say, I am fully acknowledging that the condition of Western marriages (and in Christianity) are in crisis and therefore needs attention. The core problem, though, that I am proposing, is that I have NO doubt that overemphasis is exactly the problem: it’s the culture SURROUNDING marriages that are in trouble and fail to support people.

    It’s like if I expect a skillet to mow the lawn. It’s not that there’s anything wrong with the skillet–it’s just that I’m trying to use it for something it was not designed to do. That leads to dissatisfaction and emptiness.

    What I am saying is this: Scripture is full of commands for how to “love your neighbor as yourself” (the core command) and assemble the church. Commands for marriage are like a footnote by comparison–not to minimize it, but just to say that’s merely one dimension of it. When we focus on restoring the church to health, marriage can be supported better, instead of marriage to be this be-all-end-all of human interactions God never intended it to be. That’s what I’m saying. I respect that marriage needs attention in itself, but much of the “tone” is way off, as if it’s the only human interaction that exists. 😉

    For what it’s worth, for your consideration.

  9. selfdefensiveman,

    The point you raise about non-western cultures and marriages being better there is an interesting one. The divorce rates are lower, and wives respect their husbands more and they take care of their homes better. Take for instance Indian, Arab and Asian countries where women respect their husbands, divorce is almost unheard of, and women pride themselves in caring their homes. Yet these nations have a small minority of Christians, their behavior toward their husbands and family is based upon their cultures, and not done to emulate the relationship of Christ to the Church.

    Consistently throughout the Scriptures we see that God wants us to not only do the right thing, but do it for the right reason. This is why he tells us that he judges the “thoughts and intents of the heart”.

    God wants both, the right actions, as well as the right motives for the actions. So even though these people are doing the right things, they are not truly emulating Christ and the Church for a correct reason and from the right intent. Even in America, when we did not have all the feminist poisoning of our society as we have now, and women respected their husbands, many women simply did so because the culture demanded it, not out of love for Christ, and not to truly emulate the relationship between Christ and the Church.

    You are definitely right that Marriage is not the only human interaction that exists. The Church needs to be teaching people how to be good church members,citizens and employees as well.

    You bring up God’s command to “love your neighbor as yourself”, and I can assure you that I never fully understand the implications of that command until I was married.

    It is one thing to love the stranger on the street, and give him some food, when you will only see him for a while.
    It is one thing to love your next door neighbor as yourself, whom you see for a few moments at a time.
    It is one thing to love your fellow church members as yourself, whom you see for a few hours a week.
    To love one’s children, and blood as themselves is instinctual.
    But to love one who is not blood, one whom we live with day in and day out, when they treat us poorly, when they lash out, when they do all manner of wrong against us, and we wake each day to them and then go to sleep each night with them – now that is the most intense “love your neighbor as yourself” relationship you will ever find.

    I understand where you coming, I was divorced several years back. You don’t notice how much emphasis there is on marriage until you are single, then you see it. It raises your awareness of the fact that the church needs to have ministries that allow the single person to flourish as well as married couples.

    But I maintain that I truly believe that celibacy is and should continue to be the exception, and I believe that God designed man and woman for marriage, and for marriage to be a shining example of Christ and the Church. Celibacy should be honored and used for what God intended it for, a life fully dedicated to the work of Christ. If a person remains celibate so that they can get rich, or have more power without the constraints of family, this is not what God intended Celibacy for.

    Thank you though for your comments.

  10. Do you think that is my real last name?

  11. I’ve read some of your posts, and you seem to take a very literal approach to the laws and customs recorded in the Bible, and appear to believe that those same laws and customs are meant for today (for example, wives are property of their husbands). That being said, I see in your bio that you are divorced and remarried. Do you consider you and your wife adulterers and your marriage an adulterous one?

  12. Yes I take the Bible very literally(except for those places where symbolism is called for, like prophecy, and I also recognize hyperboles in the Bible).

    Having said that – I believe there are several grounds for Biblical divorce(adultery, abandonment, abuse) and adultery is actually the easiest one to prove:

    “But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.”
    Matthew 5:32

    Fornication includes all sexual immorality – incest,premarital sex,homosexuality,bestiality and yes adultery. My first wife had two affairs while we were married, I forgave her the first one and divorced her after the second one. I had every Biblical right to divorce her.

  13. I read much of your blog, and while I respectfully disagree with some of the the things you say, I applaud you for having the guts to excersize your first amendment rights and say them! I’m just curious how you would react to this hypothetical situation: say you had a daughter or a wife who had good homemaking skills. She was incredibly artistic, could cook, sew clothes for herself or you, had good interior decorating skills, and had long hair and liked to wear pretty clothes. However, she also likes to do “boy stuff.” She likes to shoot guns and is an avid hunter. She goes fishing and likes to explore the woods. As a kid, she would build forts in the woods, climb trees, and spend hours catching bugs and frogs. Sometimes she would to play with toy spaceships and cars, and sometimes she would play with Barbies and her dollhouse and dress-up like a princess. So Sir, I’m just wondering how you would handle this situation (and yes, I’m totally describing myself). If your wife or your daughter was like this, would you forbid her from “boy” activities, even though she looks and acts like a woman, or would you allow it?

  14. Amy,

    I have absolutely no problem with girls liking to do boy stuff. My wife is an avid baseball fan and I am not. I got into watching baseball and football for her so we could connect with something. My daughter loves to watch scary movies with me and her brothers, and she also likes to play Call of Duty and other shooters, she loves playing basketball and plays on a church league in our area. My wife used to play softball(before she hurt her ankle).

    But while my daughter likes to do some “boy” things, she also loves to get her nails done or her hair done at the salon. She loves wearing pretty dresses and she wants to be a wife and mother, these things are not incompatible and will make her a great mom with her kids.

    My daughter does not like to fish(she hates the worms and stuff) and she is not really into hunting, but if she were I would not have a problem taking her.

    Some people wrongly think, that if you embrace Biblical Gender Roles, that somehow that means a woman must be trapped doing laundry and dishes, cooking and cleaning the house. That is soooo NOT true. Wives ought to have hobbies, and they ought to be able to enjoy some hobbies with their husbands and family, and also some with their girlfriends(I am big proponent of women spending time with other Christian women). Yes there may be some more hectic seasons in a wife’s life where she can’t do as much because of obligations with her kids and hubby, but if she can I am all for women doing these kinds of things.

    That is where we has husbands and dads need to step in, if things are getting hectic, and make sure mom get’s some time out do things she wants and Dad takes care of things with the kids once in a while.

    While I maintain on this site the Biblical truth, that a woman’s central focus should always be on her husband, her children and her home – that does not mean she can’t do other things with her time as well. Its all about balance.

  15. Hello,
    First off, let me say I look forward to checking your blog and learning more about God’s wisdom. In this hectic world filled with feminism and “partner marriages” it can be hard to decipher what is God’s will and what is driven by human’s sinful nature. Currently, I am struggling with a problem that stems from my similar history to you. I am in my second marriage right now, and together my current wife and I have two children. My previous marriage also created two children. This marriage ended when my wife hopped on the feminism train, had an affair, stopped respecting my authority, seemed to turn from the church, etc… A judge awarded her custody, but she is a single, full time working woman. My question is about blended families. Biblically, how does one maneuver this tricky situation? My first wife truly loves our children, and I respect that God really chose her more than me to parent and raise them, but if I don’t agree with how she is raising them, is it sinful for me to take a mother’s children from her? And if I do succeed in taking my children back how does that responsibility fall with my new wife. Is it wrong for me to demand and expect that she raise my other children though they are not the fruit of her womb?

  16. Steven,

    I don’t think it is sinful for you to try and take your children from their mother if it is for good reason. For instance I know of a Christian man who sued for custody of this kids(years after his divorce and having joint custody) because he found out the step father(her new husband) was abusing his children. Sometimes you may find out that a parent is neglecting the needs of the children and this may be a good cause.

    But if your reason is simply because you don’t agree with her morals, or different rules she has in her home than yours – then I don’t think this a legitimate reason to sue for custody of your children.

    Can you explain more – even if privately by email what you are disagreeing with on how your first wife is raising your children?

    If you do succeed in getting custody of your kids(for legitimate reasons), then no I don’t think it is wrong that you expect your wife to help take care of your children, even though they are not the fruit of her womb.

    When your wife married you, she signed on to be your helpmeet, and to come under your authority and to do whatever you need her to do. If that means being a step mother to your children, even full time, then that is her duty to do so and you do not have to feel one bit guilty about that.

    Some Christians falsely believe that God always wants a husband to put his wife’s desire ahead his children. This is belief is not supported by the Scriptures. God always wants us to put HIS will first, and the greater good first. If you truly need to take custody of your children, then that is a greater good, a greater need, than your wife being inconvenienced by having to care for your children full time(and I don’t know what she thinks).

    If you wife is surrendered to the will of God for her as a woman, she ought to rejoice at being able to help you by being a step mother to your children.

  17. I have to give you some major credit for this kind of reply. I figure this is the reason why you opt to remain anonymous. 😉

  18. I was inspired to return to this page after the legalizing of gay marriage in the West.

    “Yet these nations have a small minority of Christians, their behavior toward their husbands and family is based upon their cultures, and not done to emulate the relationship of Christ to the Church.”

    This is talking about the Eastern hemisphere of course. Another thing to consider is that the Eastern hemisphere is that – again, despite Christianity being FAR less present – is much, MUCH farther from legalizing and approving homosexuality and “gay marriage.”

    As much as I appreciate some of your fortitude in “biblical gender roles,” the portrayals of the “relationship of Christ to the Church” is severely overblown and the way you and others speak about it is clearly the tone of a post-feminist.

    I would call your attention to this article pertaining to the “duties of husbands” in marriage: God’s Commands to Husbands for Marriage.

    It is not wise to ignore the wisdom of cultures not tainted by feminism for guidance in restoring sound gender identity and family structure – which feminism clearly damaged as it infiltrated Western Christianity – assuming that they can’t have wisdom that we don’t due to not having Christianity in their cultures. The real reason, I believe, Western Christians are unwilling to examine Eastern cultures as a compass for restoring gender identity is due to lingering attachments to their own culture (including feminist “modern sensibilities”) rather than a devotion to God and His word.

    I would be interested to see your reaction to my exegeses, though, wondering how close we are to being on the same page. 😉

  19. SelfDefensiveman,

    I read your post. I agree there is a general principle of believers giving themselves up for each other, as well as a general principle of believers submitting to one another in church. However we always have to look at the context of these statements. The passages which talk about believers giving themselves up for each other, and submitting to one another are given within the context of the operations of the local assembly.

    That a husband(and father) is expected to provide for his wife(and children) is clearly seen in these passages(some of which which you allude to):

    “If he marries another woman, he must not deprive the first one of her food, clothing and marital rights.” Exodus 21:10

    “After all, no one ever hated their own body, but they feed and care for their body, just as Christ does the church” – Ephesians 5:29

    ““Which of you, if your son asks for bread, will give him a stone? 10 Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a snake? 11 If you, then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give good gifts to those who ask him! ” Matthew 7:9-11

    But I agree with you that this does not entitle a woman to just sit around and do nothing. The proverbs 31 wife “does not eat the bread of idleness” – she is constantly busy working in the home as well as doing things outside the home as well. Although I would argue based on the totality of the Scriptures that while a woman may work outside the home – her focus and her number one priority is always in caring for her husband, her children and her home.

    A Biblical wife is a busy wife – a true helper to her husband.

  20. “That a husband(and father) is expected to provide for his wife(and children) is clearly seen in these passages”

    I disagree that this is “clearly seen” in the sense that it is only a man’s job. No one would argue, for example, that the wife of a temporarily-disabled man (or permanently for that matter) is entitled to letting him starve for the same reason vice-versa is not acceptable: “the two are one flesh.” Women did not have the right to divorce, however, and for natural reasons, yes a man’s power to be a provider has been greater–something in which God had intent, no doubt, such that woman would be more materially dependent.

    My only point in this case is that the “as Christ loved the church” is getting fantastically abused beyond its meaning. One of your comments suggests another very feminist outlook of “women were/are oppressed” while there is no biblical case for that .

    I am just talking to you, here. 😉 As we agree, cleaning out the church from the world is part of what we do.

  21. PS, just to be clear, I hate to sound argumentative because I have a lot of agreement with you overall. 😉

  22. selfdenfensiveman,

    I agree with you that a wife ought to help her husband in anyway that he needs. Sometimes that requires a woman taking on a job to help the family finances, especially if the husband is not physically able to work.

    Let me frame this for you a little differently:

    The Bible is clear that a woman’s first duty is to the care of her home and her children:

    “That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.” Titus 2:4-6 (KJV)

    “I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully.” I Timothy 5:14 (KJV)

    “She looketh well to the ways of her household, and eateth not the bread of idleness.” – Proverbs 31:27(KJV)

    While caring for a home may not be a full time job, caring for very young children often is. I believe that if we put all the Scriptures together – we see that God wants a woman caring for the needs of her home and her children first and foremost, and only working outside the home in temporary ways as needed. Yes can woman plant a field? Sure but this is not the same as her abandoning her children to others so she can pursue a career outside her home.

    It is one thing if the husband is disabled and cannot work, but if a man is able bodied – I believe it is his duty to make sure his wife can do her duty to the best of her ability to care for her children and her home.

    And don’t worry about being argumentative – we are just having a friendly discussion and I know you and I do have a lot of agreement on issues.

  23. Christ went for a long time before wanting all but a select few to know that he was the Christ and the Son of God. We aren’t specifically told why that is, but I personally think that it’s for a couple of reasons: firstly, Jesus needed to live a “normal” life as a human for most of his life, and secondly, because he wanted to establish himself by way of his righteous manner reputation-wise as opposed to just telling people to take his word for it.

    Hiding himself from the Jews until his reputation was established? (Of course, he didn’t do this forever). I don’t know–could be. Apostles didn’t exactly look to go to places where they knew they would be persecuted. Jesus said, “If you are persecuted in one city, flee to another.”

    There could be some validity to it in the sense that an established reputation is good–to be exposed among supporters. One of the reasons why Jesus’ enemies didn’t kill him on many occasions was because they feared the support that he had from other people. i.e. Jesus was effectively protected by popularity many times.

    Jesus did tell us not to throw pearls to swine, because they would turn around and trample us. On the internet, you can’t help but throw what you have out to the whole world. It could be that, in the meantime, pro-men sources simply have to go incognito to communicate with another just because the better part of the world is truly out to harm us.

  24. I was looking for a website like this for a long time. was out yesterday praying for what has become an eternity, half an hour. We live in times where men, most of all anointed men are under incredible assault, on every level imagineable. Media, courts, and most of all, churches. It was relief to my soul to find this page and the articles written. I have wrestled for months and weeks with god over why he creat3d me a man in times where men dont exist. They are singled out and harrassed or killed. Modern women have gone way overboard with their self justifcations and self anointings. Everytime i was in jail it was a woman. And the next time it will be a woman again. The devil used eve in genesis. He uses eve today. I enjoyed reading and think you should not try to justify your perspective in replying to your own threads. Save your time to write more threads instead. Thank you for your website. Mark

  25. Heya! So happy to find this site. Unfortunately lost all I typed when I signed into Gravatar. So I will paraphrase. I’ve been reading non-stop for the past 3 hours and I am looking forward to reading more soon. Also, I wanted to give one comment regarding the Eastern hemisphere as it is where I have been living for the last 7 years. The women here don’t have the same options as Western women so that may have an influence on divorce rates – especially for older women. The older a woman is the less likely she is to find “honest” work so many women have a strong motivation to be married and stay married. In the case of where I live now in Indonesia a man may not even have to give financial support for children, let alone the divorced wife. Unfortunately there has been a heavy impact on women not to be homemakers. It has become a stigma and deemed suitable for the lowly-educated so many women with good educations are shunning those valuable duties when they could be among the best homemakers. I am uncertain why this trend has been the case (there are some exceptions among the Muslim population who do seem to value homemaking more — although it is also waning). This may be due to the influx of Western programming streaming over the internet, cable television, and satellite channels. I find that among the general population — especially Christians who identify better with Western culture due to sharing what they consider to be Christian sourced programming (here everyone has to ascribe to a religion and they assume every foreigner and most Western programming to have some influence of Christianity – yet we Westerners know different) any woman currently under the age of about 40 has little or no interest to be a homemaker. This means they don’t know how to cook, take care of children or take care of things at home while the man is away. It is like a crash course when they get married because the society here is starting to push the same values we adore so much in the West. So I would say that divorce seems to be less likely, but the value of being a homemaker has been declining rapidly for the last 25-30 years. Anyway, I look forward to more reading and comparing my own notes from my own Bible studies!

  26. I am feeling sooo lost and helpless. I was raised in a christian way and my husband also (but I saw him destroy a cross after his parents died). We are married for 16 years now and after we had been married he showed his real side (approx. 4 times a year sex from behind (I never saw him and feel sooo abused and worthless after all these years of receiving nothing). I tried talking to him for many years and he thinks that I should the person that should make lots of efforts to stimulate him, which I can not do (as I need a little romance). He does not work, does not provide any income; What can I do (he told me that he keeps our house if Ieave and I get nothing). Please advise as I am about to give up on everything.

  27. Anonymos,

    I am truly sorry to hear about the sinful behavior of your husband. Spouses can sin against each other in many ways but God does not allow divorce for just any type of sin. Rather he only allows it for a few sins that he has decided are grave enough to break the marriage covenant.

    You can read about these reasons in my post https://biblicalgenderroles.com/for-what-reasons-does-god-allow-divorce/

    In it I provide Scriptures that I believe allow these 4 reasons that a woman may divorce her husband:

    1 If he fails to provide her with food and clothing (shelter is implied with clothing).
    2 If he refuses to have regular sexual relations with her (sexual defraudment).
    3 If he physically abuses her or makes attempts on her life.
    4 If he abandons her.

    It sounds as if your husband is definitely guilty of reason no 3(failure to provide) unless he is physically disabled from working.
    He may also be guilty of reason no 1 because he is not giving you regular relations when you desire it. He is taking power over your body(which is his right) but he is not giving you power over his body(which is your right).

    I suggest you also look at these two other posts that I think will help you as a wife:
    https://biblicalgenderroles.com/2015/09/16/4-steps-to-confronting-your-husbands-sexual-refusal/
    https://biblicalgenderroles.com/2015/08/16/does-god-allow-a-woman-to-divorce-her-husband-for-failure-to-provide/

    I don’t know how he would keep the house unless you had a prenuptial agreement and he owned the house before you were married. Otherwise any divorce court would force him to sell the house and divide half the proceeds with you or he would have to get a loan for your half to pay you.

    Even if you don’t get the house, that is a small price to pay to be out of that kind of misery.

    I pray that God will guide you and give you wisdom in dealing with this tragic situation.

  28. I have just started reading your posts and enjoyed several of them. I have a query. Both my husband and I are Christians and have been married for 20 years. We have 2 kids who are still young. My husband was involved in porn soon after our marriage and refused to have any kind of intimacy, not even holding hands. I suspect that he does not even love me and is continuing the marriage only for the comfort of financial stability it offers him.

    He lost his job 2 years after we were married. Then we relocated and he has not found a job until now. It has been 17 years of unemployment. If I raise this issue it makes him angry and frustrated. I think he wants to start a business but lacks capital. I have a good job but I have to pay the mortgage, cars, family’s expenses and any holidays we have. Basically I cover everything. I have a cleaner who cleans the house. My husband takes care of the children, send them to school and helps with their homework. Any extra income I save for my children’s future education and our retirement. There is not much extra to contribute towards his “dream business”. Maybe I am scared, in case he uses up the money for business and the business fails. I cannot earn back this kind of money now as I am much older now and coming to retirement age. He pays for all the expenses from my bank account. I never question him regarding how he spends the money or how much he spends. I use my money mainly to purchase items for our home. He is free to buy anything for himself. i don’t ask to account for each purchase.

    He has mentioned having a joint account. I have trust issues; my marriage is not even normal. I have dealt with wives whose husbands left the marriage and the kids with all the family money in a joint account. Letting a husband have access to the wife’s account may be ideal in a good marriage but not otherwise. His family has also been hinting that my inheritance monies from my dad’s estate should be shared equally with him. I am frankly disgusted with this as he has been so fussy looking for jobs and has left me to struggle with the family’s finances for years, despite my deteriorating health. I want to share what I have with him and the children but he wants to control what happens to the money. Legally he is not even entitled to this money. If I have to hand over to my husband what my father struggled to earn during his lifetime in the name of submission, I have decided either to pass on everything to the kids by a will or to forego my entitlement and give away everything to charity. Less fight this way.

    I would appreciate your views.

    Concerned

  29. Hope – I am very sorry to hear about your situation with your husband.

    I have written a post addressing your story:
    https://biblicalgenderroles.com/2016/04/01/4-steps-to-dealing-with-a-lazy-and-fraudulent-husband/

  30. Thank you for sharing, I appreciate very much that your seeking to obey God in your outreach to other Christians. As for the differences in our Roles as Christian Men and Woman to save wordage here I will leave a link for you that shows why we need to have God given roles both in Marriage and in the Church and also another link on why there is error in the Churches today.

    Roles- https://freedomborn.wordpress.com/2015/06/23/woman-are-precious-to-god/

    Error in Churches- http://freedomborn.wordpress.com/2014/06/16/my-battle-with-confusion/

    I was also wondering why you think because you have been divorced you can’t be in a Position of Authority in the Church, yes I have heard this before but found the Scripture used was out of context but perhaps you know of others.

    “Christ”ian Love – Anne.

  31. FreedomBorn,

    Thank for your kind words. I believe I am not qualified for the position of Pastor or deacon(local church offices) because of my divorce based on this passage:

    “A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;”
    I Timothy 3:2 (KJV)

    I believe the phrase “husband of one wife” refers to a man not being divorced, that he is still the husband of his first wife. Some churches teach this refers to a prohibition against polygamy while other churches believe it prohibits both a divorced man or a polygamist from being a Pastor. I personally believe it is only referring to a a divorced man and it is not talking about polygamy.

    There is another place in the Bible that uses the same phrasing but instead is talking about Christian women, specifically widows that would be supported by and thus serve the church:

    “Let not a widow be taken into the number under threescore years old, having been the wife of one man.” – I Timothy 5:9 (KJV)

    Now no one would argue that the phrase here in I Timothy 5:9 “having been the wife of one man” was talking about wives being polygamous but instead we understand as referring to the fact that a woman could not come into the full time support and therefore service of the church if she had been divorced. I this is why I believe the restriction that a Bishop and deacon must be the husband of one wife refers to the fact that they were not divorced.

    Having said that. Even if were not divorced I would still not considered myself called to be a Pastor of a local church. Pastors of local churches still have many political ties. If a man takes on the pastorate of an existing church when they church takes him on he must agree to enforce and abide by the interpretations of Scripture and traditions of that church. Even if in the case of church planters there often times many political considerations that inhibit Pastors from teaching politically correct things.

    God uses men both inside the church and through its ministries to serve his will and he also uses men outside the church to teach or serve him in other ways. I believe my calling is the latter. I can say the things that many Pastors are afraid to say but they now what I am saying is right and Biblical. I truly believe the revival will first come in the home, in marriage and families and then it will come to the churches. The people’s hearts and minds must be changed first by them listening to the Word of God, the whole word of God and not just the parts that are publicly spoken in church. That is what I am trying to do through this ministry.

  32. What does the Bible say about women working outside the home?

    Whether or not a woman should work outside the home is a struggle for many couples and families. The Bible does have instructions regarding the role of women. In Titus 2:3-4, Paul gives these instructions as to how a young married woman is to be trained by older women: “…train the younger women to love their husbands and children, to be self-controlled and pure, to be busy at home, to be kind, and to be subject to their husbands so that no one will malign the Word of God.” In this passage, the Bible is clear that when children are in the picture, that is where the young woman’s responsibility lies. The older women are to teach the younger women and to live lives that glorify God. Keeping these responsibilities in mind, an older woman’s time can be spent at the Lord’s leading and her discretion.

    Proverbs 31 speaks of “a wife of noble character.” Starting at verse 11, the writer praises this woman as one who does everything in her power to care for her family. She works hard to keep her house and her family in order. Verses 16, 18, 24, and 25 show that she is so industrious that she also moonlights with a cottage industry that provides additional income for her family. This woman’s motivation is important in that her business activities were the means to an end, not an end in themselves. She was providing for her family, not furthering her career, or working to keep up with the neighbors. Her employment was secondary to her true calling—the stewardship of her husband, children, and home.

    The Bible nowhere forbids a woman from working outside the home. However, the Bible does teach what a woman’s priorities are to be. If working outside the home causes a woman to neglect her children and husband, then it is wrong for that woman to work outside the home. If a Christian woman can work outside the home and still provide a loving, caring environment for her children and husband, then it is perfectly acceptable for her to work outside the home. With those principles in mind, there is freedom in Christ. Women who work outside the home should not be condemned, and neither should women who focus on the stewardship of the home be treated with condescension.

  33. I just wanted to thank you for this site. Very helpful and encouraging. I got on looking up the word, “honour” on Google and it led me to the article on men honoring their wives. I am a woman but found the article a great way to help me pray for the difficult job The Lord has entrusted to my husband. It can’t be an easy task to always have to be the strong one all the time. I appreciate your stand on God’s Word and your desire to honor It in the way you are. Thank you!

  34. Hello sir,

    I’m looking at all of the dates on the comments and it seems I’m a little late to the party.
    Hopefully not though, because I really want your answer to these questions.

    I understand that you believe the Bible should be taken literally and I understand your views on gender roles. However, I was curious about how you feel about a woman choosing a career over having children. Do you think it’s wrong for a woman to reject children entirely and not have them at all?

    I also know that the Bible instructs wives to submit to their husbands, and that you believe the same, but do you also believe that women should live their lives under the rule of all men, or just their husbands?

    I’m not attacking or judging you, I’m just honestly curious.

  35. malvale2,

    Your Question:

    “I was curious about how you feel about a woman choosing a career over having children. Do you think it’s wrong for a woman to reject children entirely and not have them at all?”

    Yes it is a sin for a woman to reject either marriage or having children UNLESS God has granted her the gift of celibacy for service to him(I Corinthians 7:7). The reason that this is sinful is because such a rejection is a rejection of God’s first command to mankind(men and women) to “Be fruitful, and multiply” (Genesis 1:28). God never rescinded that command.

    When a woman chooses to have a career say as a politician, a scientist, and engineer or host of other fields she is may convince herself that she serving others by doing this but in reality she is really only serving her own selfish ambition. She rejecting God as her creator and the purpose for which he designed her. He did not design her to live for herself and do whatever she pleased, he created her to be a help meet to man – meaning he created her to be a wife and a mother.

    See these other articles I wrote on these topics:
    https://biblicalgenderroles.com/for-what-reasons-does-god-allow-celibacy/
    https://biblicalgenderroles.com/2015/11/20/young-ladies-if-you-pursue-a-career-you-may-fail-the-christian-race/

  36. malvale2,

    Your Question:

    “I also know that the Bible instructs wives to submit to their husbands, and that you believe the same, but do you also believe that women should live their lives under the rule of all men, or just their husbands?”

    The Bible teaches that God has placed men over women in general in society as well as in particular in the church and in the home.

    1. God made man to image him or in other words display his attributes in how he lives his life(I Corinthians 11:7).

    2. God made woman for man as helper suitable for man’s purpose in imaging God.(I Corinthians 11:9).

    3. Because God made man to image him, he placed he gave man dominion over all creation including women (I Corinthians 11:3).

    4. This is why the Bible considers to be shameful and unnatural for women to rule over men politically or otherwise (Isaiah 3:12).

    5. In particular, daughters are to obey their fathers(Exodus 22:16-17, Numbers 30) and wives are to obey their husbands(Ephesians 5:22-24, I Peter 3:1-6).

    So no a woman does not have to obey every man she comes in contact with, but rather only the men that have God given authority over her. So yes she should obey a policeman or other law enforcement official. She should obey her father or her husband as well. She should obey her Pastor. But she must realize that each of these different types of authority have different kinds of authority. They have different spheres of power. Each is limited to their domain.

    The Scriptures show us the most power of all human authorities is that of the husband. It is the only human authority where the one under that authority is told to submit as “as unto the Lord” (Ephesians 5:22).

  37. Hello Sir!
    I came across your blog when researching about dressing modestly as a woman. I am newly a Christian and came from a sinful life as a Wiccan and practiced in the occult! I know scary stuff, but through the love and mercy of Christ, I am new in his image. Praise be to God! I am currently a college student at a non-christian University, actually one of the top 10 party schools in America (I began studying here before I was Chrisitan). I am removing myself from my previous sinful life and it is not easy but I am surprising myself how much I am changing and how much happier I am. I have always supported gender roles and the importance of modesty in my heart even when I was not a practicing Christian. I have a question regarding women’s dress. Do you believe women should wear skirts? I love wearing skirts and generally find them very lovely and feminine but I have a hard time committing to the ‘Christian Look’ because I do have very prominent tattoos on my arms and I find it a contradicting look, dressing modestly and having tattoos and shorter hair. Mind you I got these tattoos before I found Christ, and wish I have never scared my body in the way I did but that’s who I was before Christ was in my life. I guess I am just asking for advice. I want to honor God in all I do but I find these large tattoos in my arms are holding me back. Strong opinions from my friends and family are likely to follow my modest dressings and I know my family and potentially strangers will comment about my tattoo arms. Simply asking for kind encouragement and a friend.
    Thanks for reading and God Bless you!
    -Samantha

  38. Samantha,

    Much to my disliking, my son got some tattoos(he is 19). They are in good taste and patriotic but still. One of the plumbers he works with(his Uncle) makes him wear long sleeves to cover the tattoos on his arms while he works. He thinks it could reflect badly with the customers.

    I think in the same way with you that you should do your best to cover your tattoos especially when it comes to going to church and other church activities. That might mean some style changes. Also I have known of some people who either had them removed(I know very difficult) or others had new tattoos that were less offensive put over top to cover the bad tattoos.

    I also know(because I have a wife and daughter) that it is hard to find long sleeve dresses and blouses that look nice. If you can find them then great. If not then I would wear pants and long sleeve shirts if they won’t go with a skirt. I have talked about that it is not sinful or wrong for a woman to wear pants in the following article:

    https://biblicalgenderroles.com/2016/03/04/is-it-wrong-for-christian-women-to-wear-pants/

    I am so happy to hear you have come to Christ. Keep me posted on your growth in the Christian walk and please feel free to send questions any time.

  39. Thank you so much for the response that was very encouraging and helpful! I will most definitely continue to explore your website and your posts. God Bless you and your family.

    Samantha

  40. Love your stuff but good idea on going incognito. You tackle some really tough issues with sound biblical answers. Thanks!

  41. If you haven’t already, you should make an article that touches Heightism.

  42. Joseph Esposito Avatar
    Joseph Esposito

    God bless you Larry, sir, I think you are MORE CREDIBLE than most Christians. I have a slight disagreement about wo-MEN’S dress, I think they should cover ALL the curvy parts of their body. I think even bathing suits are wrong. BUT… apart from this slight doctrinal difference, I THINK YOU ARE A GREAT MAN! You are far more credible than today’s MATRIARCHAL pagan Christians who exalt wo-MEN. I think Polygamy should be accepted as a choice for exceptional circumstances, such as, wo-MEN out numbering MEN, MEN’S stronger sex drives, etc. I also agree with you about NOT needing marriage licenses, it seem modern Christians want to subjugate the MAN to the wo-MAN, and use the government to do it. I also agree with you that Harvey Weinstein was FRAMED, as Cosby was as well. IT seems modern Christians think like fEMINISTS, in that they are willing to criminalize MEN just for being sinful. I would like to keep in touch with you, I think you are a valuable MAN, and much needed today. Please get back to me if you can, with any feedback you may have. I agree with MOST of your teachings. God bless!

  43. Joseph,

    Thank you for your kind words of encouragement. You can email me @biblicalgenderroles@gmail.com – that more than any other communication things I have (comments here, on Facebook or Instagram) is the way to get a hold of me the fastest.

    Larry

  44. Thank you for your service that God has led you into. I am glad you described and helped me to know the difference between men’s sexual nature and what is ok versus what makes it a sin.

    Stay well!
    Dean

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.